Alignment Finetuning
Refining AI models to better align with human preferences and safety constraints through targeted training techniques.
Overview
Alignment finetuning is the process of taking pre-trained AI models and further training them to align with human values and preferences. This typically involves techniques like reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), supervised fine-tuning on high-quality demonstrations, and constitutional AI methods. The goal is to make models more helpful, harmless, and honest while preserving their capabilities. This research area is critical for deploying powerful AI systems safely in real-world applications.
Key Research Areas
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF)
Supervised fine-tuning on human demonstrations
Constitutional AI and principle-based training
Prompt engineering and instruction following
Red teaming and adversarial training for safety
Balancing capability preservation with alignment
Research Challenges
Maintaining model capabilities during alignment training
Scaling human feedback collection efficiently
Avoiding alignment tax on model performance
Preventing reward hacking and specification gaming
Generalizing alignment across diverse contexts
Ensuring alignment remains stable during deployment
Practical Applications
Creating safer conversational AI assistants
Reducing harmful outputs in production models
Improving instruction-following capabilities
Building models that refuse inappropriate requests
Aligning specialized domain models (medical, legal)
Developing more controllable AI systems
Technical Deep Dive
Modern alignment finetuning typically uses a multi-stage approach. First, supervised fine-tuning (SFT) trains the model on high-quality human demonstrations. Then, reward modeling learns human preferences from comparative judgments. Finally, reinforcement learning optimizes the model against the learned reward model using algorithms like PPO. Recent advances include direct preference optimization (DPO) which skips explicit reward modeling, and techniques for handling off-policy data. Constitutional AI extends this by having models critique and revise their own outputs according to principles. The field increasingly focuses on scalable oversight methods that work even when models become more capable than evaluators.
Future Research Directions
Research is moving toward more sample-efficient alignment methods that require less human feedback. Automated red teaming and AI-assisted evaluation may reduce the human labor needed. Understanding how alignment finetuning affects model internals through interpretability research could enable more robust techniques. Multi-objective alignment that balances multiple values is an emerging area. As models become more capable, alignment finetuning must scale to handle increasingly complex scenarios and maintain alignment under recursive self-improvement.
Related Research Topics
Discuss This Research
Interested in collaborating or discussing alignment finetuning? Get in touch.
Contact Francis