Research Methodology

A comprehensive approach to studying superintelligence, AI safety, and advanced AI systems through rigorous theoretical analysis, empirical observation, and critical evaluation.

Core Research Principles

Theoretical Foundations

Comprehensive review of historical and contemporary literature in AI safety, superintelligence theory, and related fields. Building upon established frameworks while identifying gaps and opportunities for new contributions.

Empirical Observation

Systematic evaluation of current AI systems to test theoretical predictions and identify emergent behaviors. Tracking capability development in real-world systems to inform theoretical models.

Critical Analysis

Rigorous examination of assumptions, methodologies, and conclusions in existing research. Identifying potential biases, logical fallacies, and areas requiring more robust evidence.

Systems Thinking

Understanding AI development as complex system dynamics with interacting components, feedback loops, and emergent properties. Avoiding reductionist approaches that miss crucial system-level behaviors.

Research Process

1. Literature Review & Gap Analysis

Comprehensive survey of existing research to understand the current state of knowledge, identify theoretical gaps, and determine where new contributions can have the most impact.

  • • Systematic literature search across multiple databases
  • • Analysis of citation networks and research trajectories
  • • Identification of under-explored areas and contradictions
  • • Mapping of theoretical frameworks and their evolution

2. Theoretical Development

Construction of formal models and frameworks to explain observed phenomena or make testable predictions about AI system behavior and development trajectories.

  • • Development of mathematical models where applicable
  • • Logical analysis of argument structures
  • • Identification of assumptions and their implications
  • • Construction of testable hypotheses

3. Empirical Testing & Observation

Systematic evaluation of current AI systems to test theoretical predictions and gather data on capability development, emergent behaviors, and system dynamics.

  • • Benchmarking exercises on state-of-the-art models
  • • Analysis of public AI system releases and capabilities
  • • Tracking of capability scaling with model size and compute
  • • Documentation of unexpected behaviors and limitations

4. Synthesis & Publication

Integration of findings into coherent frameworks and communication of results through research papers, technical reports, and public-facing content.

  • • Clear documentation of methods and findings
  • • Transparent discussion of limitations and uncertainties
  • • Accessibility of research to diverse audiences
  • • Open sharing of methodologies for reproducibility

Research Quality Standards

Intellectual Honesty

Transparent reporting of methods, limitations, and uncertainties. Acknowledgment of alternative explanations and contradictory evidence. Avoiding motivated reasoning and confirmation bias.

Rigor & Precision

Clear definitions of terms and concepts. Logical consistency in arguments. Appropriate use of formal methods where applicable. Careful distinction between speculation and established findings.

Accessibility

Research communicated in clear, comprehensible language without sacrificing precision. Multiple levels of presentation to serve both expert and general audiences. Open access to findings whenever possible.

Tools & Resources

Research is conducted using a combination of literature databases, computational tools, and analytical frameworks:

Literature & Analysis

  • • Academic databases (arXiv, Google Scholar, Semantic Scholar)
  • • Citation analysis tools
  • • Systematic review methodologies
  • • Argument mapping software

Computation & Modeling

  • • Python for data analysis and visualization
  • • Statistical modeling frameworks
  • • AI model API access for benchmarking
  • • Interactive visualization tools

Questions About the Methodology?

Interested in discussing research methods, proposing collaborations, or learning more about the approach used in specific studies?

Get in Touch